Talk:United Galaxy Space Force (Drillimation)/@comment-32042378-20170530170606

(I couldn't reply to your comment directly so I made a new one)

There is a large difference between blatent plagerism and a dertvitive work, which is what you're implying. An example of a derivitive work is if I take one of your characters and gave it glasses or a tuxedo. Plagerism is essentially stealing other's work and claiming it as your own, which is what you have seemingly have done here. For another example, you have used UGSF, Galaxian, Dig Dug and Ace Combat (Bandai Namco) as well as Lucky Star (Kagami Yoshimetzu), all of which are copyrighted works that you have not created.

I might as well state that the argument "Since is a fanon wiki, users can add their own twists and turns to existing franchises" is somewhat invalid. Yes this a fanon wiki, but what you're impying again is that one could seemingly write up hundreds of articles about say Ridge Racer, and claim that they own the full video game rights to them, when in fact it is owned by Bandai Namco Holdings, not the actual writer of the article. Even if the "users can add their own teists and turns to existing franchises" statement in your argument can apply to such a wiki, then what's the problem with creating your own video game universe that contains your original properties instead of using the name of someone else's video game universe and tossing in properties that you do not own?

Now I'm not saying that you should be ashamed at all, I'm simply applying real-world facts to the argument you have provided. It is nice to see someone else who is into old Namco properties, but it is reccomended that you could create a video game universe or your own without having to utilize other's works.