Thread:Ootwar/@comment-37140786-20200212221859/@comment-37140786-20200222162602

Ootwar wrote: The Supreme Huntington Master wrote:

The Supreme Huntington Master wrote: Ootwar wrote: The Supreme Huntington Master wrote: Ootwar wrote: The Supreme Huntington Master wrote: Ootwar wrote: The Supreme Huntington Master wrote: When are you gonna announce the new Auxiliary staff to replace Tanardo Loud? I don't just *announce* new auxiliary staff. The people who want to be that need to be super active regular contributors and also need to have really really really reaLLY REALLY good reasons for the promotion. Ok, here's my reason:

I can do the extra help we needed, anything that requires a moderator to do it, I'll do it. Not good enough. Go into the greatest detail you ever could and convince me you are actually trustworthy. Tell me your weaknesses, your strengths, your special topics/interests. Everything. Ok, topics I do for pages are usually about any of the Kadersaryinan Islands countries, I sometimes might do ones on any of the Jetanie Archepelago countries, El Kadsreian Islands' countries, and on any countries I adopt/co-owner of. I'm interested for extra help for anything a moderator is capable of doing, i'm willing to do things that does great for the community, which I want to improve the transaction of getting someone to be banned faster for their wrongdoings. Getting frustrated when people don't do as I say, especially when they refuse to it too many times and then I'll have a stern comment against a person for not being uncooperative is a weakness for me. Being overloaded is another weakness, so I can solve that by passing parts of the overload to other administrators. Having the balence of being strict and the freedom is my strength. Another strength for me is that I don't backstab something that I'm loyal to.

That's all I have, should I add more to this, or you're satisfied? "extra help for anything a moderator is capable of doing" is still not a good reason, next.

"I don't backstab something that I'm loyal to" is a bit too generic as well, and ngl, it's sounds like a cover/lie as well, I really want to know if you can be trusted. "I don't backstab something that I'm loyal to" is actually not a lie, it's one of my strengths.

I'm trusted in the community, there might be some or a bunch of people that would hate on me, most people like what I do and would want me to become a new auxiliary staff if they voted for me. If the "I don't backstab something that I'm loyal to" statement was a lie, then why would I said it out loud if it was a lie? Also, lying about it would make me an establishment, not a populist, that's like saying I support the promotion of screwing over people, when in reality, I don't support that.

With the "I don't backstab something that I'm loyal to" statement, stuff that people had been loyal for years are still allow to criticise it, even know people enjoy it, but factors want to ruin it for everyone. If they never listened to the criticism, then we the people keep fighting for the demand everyone wants.

So, Ootwar what do you think, if that's not convincing for you, then should I say anything else I didn't said yet? Trust me, I've been through a lot of untrustworthy admins that promise to "be good and loyal and not backstab anyone they're loyal to". They say such vague statements to gain trust, and I'm no longer gonna fall for it.

The election was different because we were desperate for a new unified team. This is not that case at all, because this is about the extra positions, the auxiliary mod thing, that is only supposed to be for people who have good reasons and enough trust.

And especially after Tanardo, I'm not gonna give it to literally anyone. This is something sacred, and I don't want to ruin everything by giving it to a random person.

Okay? Okay. Then I don't know who's actually gonna be the new auxiliary staff if it's not me, but I already rotted away all of my chances for mentioning statements I shouldn't had said out loud. I now believe that it would be better off to scrap it altogether instead of keeping it around and kept leaving it vacant.